Delhi High Court · 2025-05-14
DEEPAK TYAGI vs STATE NCT OF DELHI
- Citation / case number
- BAIL APPLN.-1840/2025 2025:DHC:3722
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- DEEPAK TYAGI
- Respondent
- STATE NCT OF DELHI
Judgment text excerpt
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14.05.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1840/2025 & CRL.M.A. 14907/2025 DEEPAK TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Mr. Rajendra Singh and Mr. Paras Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Mahaveer and SI Manish, PS Daryaganj. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 585/2023 of PS Daryaganj for offences under Section 392/395/397/412/120B/182/ 211/212/109/34 IPC. The earlier bail application of the accused/applicant was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, the accused/applicant filed fresh bail application before the learned Trial Court which was dismissed vide order dated 09.05.2025. Hence, the present application. 2. Learned APP accepts notice and assisted by the Investigating Officer/SI Mahaveer, fairly concedes that the accused/applicant deserves parity with the co-accused Asif Khan, who was granted regular bail by this court vide detailed order dated 27.03.2025. BAIL APPLN. 1840/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.14 17:53:46 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:14.05.2025 18:34:04 3. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he conspired in commission of dacoity involving an amount of Rs. 90,00,000/-. The accused/applicant was not personally involved in the actual act of dacoity. However, out of the allegedly looted money, a sum of Rs. 19,66,000/- was allegedly recovered from his house. Unlike co-accused Asif Khan, the accused/applicant was not even an employee of the victim Mayank Jain. 4. F