DEEPAK MOWAR vs PAYAL SINGH & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~47 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28th May, 2025 + CM(M) 1036/2025 & CM APPL. 33868-33871/2025 DEEPAK MOWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Nigam, Advocate. versus PAYAL SINGH & ANR. .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order whereby learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi has issued non-bailable warrants against him on 09.04.2025 in EA/78/2024. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that there is no intention to run away from the execution proceedings but according to him, the complaint was, merely, against the Company of which the petitioner is stated to be a Director at one point of time. He submits that even the execution petition had been filed against JD Company only and it was only during the proceedings of the case, relying upon general directions given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Periyammal v. V. Rajamani, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 507, the learned District Commission has chosen to issue non-bailable warrants, without any advance notice. 3. It is informed that the abovesaid order, whereby warrants were issued against the petitioner, was challenged by the petitioner by filing appeal and such appeal i.e. EA No. 29/2025 was taken up by the learned State Commission on 13.05.2025. Though, notice has been issued to the opposite Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 1036/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:29.05.2025 11:24:47 side, there is no reference with respect to the urgent relief sought by the appellant whereby it requested for stay of non-bailable warrants. 4. It is submitted that such appeal, has been adjourned by the learned State Commission for 27.08.2025 and if, in the interregnum,