CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25103 of 2024 at Allahabad

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84806 Court No. - 47 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25103 of 2024 Applicant :- Bhanu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Shankar Tripathi,Satish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Manvendra Singh Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard Sri Satish Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Manvendra Singh and Sri Nan Pal, learned counsels for the informant and learned A.G.A for the State. There are allegations against the applicant of committing the offence of rape against major and married woman after entering into her house. Counsel for the applicant submits that in the statement of the alleged witness, Raj Kumar, was recorded by the investigating officer in which he has supported the prosecution story but he is not eye-witness of the alleged incident. There is no explanation why he come on the spot after hearing the alarm of the victim and if the applicant committed rape against the victim then why said allegation has not been made in the F.I.R as well as in the statement of victim recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Counsel for the applicant also submits that it is a case of false implication of ap