CHIRAG SNEHKANT VORA vs STATE G0VT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 09.05.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4629/2024 & CRL.M.A. 37870/2024 (stay) CHIRAG SNEHKANT VORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raghav Parwatiyar and Ms. Shikha Walia, Advocates. versus STATE G0VT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for State with with SI Sachin. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. In furtherance of last order, the Investigating Officer/SI Sachin has appeared today with the investigation file. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant as well as learned APP assisted by the Investigating Officer. In the course of submissions, the Investigating Officer also produced a pen drive, allegedly containing a video evidence against the accused/applicant and that pen drive was played on the court computer. 2. The accused/applicant seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 805/2024 of PS Karol Bagh for offence under Section 318(4)/316(2)/ 3(5) Bail Application 4629/2024 Page 1 of 6 pages GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.09 17:59:39 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:09.05.2025 18:40:33 BNS. Briefly stated, the case set up by the prosecution is as follows. 2.1 The complainant de facto Pankaj Mehra was working as a salesman in a jewellery manufacturing firm namely Manjusha Jewels Indus India Pvt. Ltd. and for promotion of their sale, they put up stalls in exhibitions at different places. 2.2 On 23.08.2024, the accused Jignesh approached Udit Garg, son of Sanjay Garg, Director of Manjusha Jewels and introduced himself as a jewellery trader in Karol Bagh. Jignesh told Udit Garg that he wants to engage in business transaction with Manjusha Jewels, having seen their jewellery in the exhi