Delhi High Court · 2025-05-02
CEPCO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs TEWARI RESTAURANT PRIVATE LIMITED
- Citation / case number
- CS(COMM)-17/2023 2025:DHC:3694
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- CEPCO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
- Respondent
- TEWARI RESTAURANT PRIVATE LIMITED
Judgment text excerpt
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 2nd May, 2025 + CS(COMM) 17/2023, CCP(O) 51/2023, I.A. 16516/2022, I.A. 6618/2023, I.A. 43252/2024 CEPCO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Ms. Shambhavi Kala and Ms. Shivalika Rudrabatla, Advocates. versus TEWARI RESTAURANT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ankur Jain, Advocate for D-2. Mr. Ujjawal Ghai, Advocate for D-3 along with Defendant No.3 in person. Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC and Mr. Govind Sharma and Mr. Madhav Bajaj for ROC (UOI). % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA JUDGMENT MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL): CS(COMM) 17/2023 1. The captioned suit was initially filed against the Defendant No.1, because of non-adherence of financial discipline by the said Defendant in payment of rent as per terms of the Lease Deed dated 22.03.2016. The Plaintiff inter alia sought recovery of arrears of rent for period of (i) April, 2021 to November, 2021; and (ii) December, 2021 till handing over of the vacant possession of the leased premises i.e., F-14 and F-15, F- Block, Inner Signature Not Verified Signed By:HEMANT CS(COMM) 17/2023 Page 1 of 12 PRATAP SINGH Signing Date:13.05.2025 20:16:54 Circle, Connaught Place, New Delhi –110001. 1.1. It is a matter of record that Defendant No. 1 vacated the suit property on 13.04.2024 and is thus liable for payment of rent until 31.03.2024. 1.2. This Court vide judgment dated 22.08.2024 held that corporate veil of Defendant No.1 has been used by its Directors to defraud the Plaintiff and the Court. The Court vide the said judgment lifted the corporate veil of the Defendant No.1 and impleaded its directors i.e., Mr. Vikram Handa, Mr. Dev Kumar Arora and Mr. Noorul Arfeen as Defendant Nos. 2, 3, and 4 respec