BARKHA BANSAL vs SUNIL KOHLI

Judgment text excerpt

$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 + C.R.P. 165/2025 BARKHA BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. C.M. Grover, Adv. versus SUNIL KOHLI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sagar Pathak, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM APPL. 33517/2025[Exemption from filing certified copies] CM APPL. 33518/2025[Exemption from filing typed/legible copies] 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The Applications stand disposed of. C.R.P. 165/2025 3. The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’] seeking to challenge an order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the Ld. District Judge-02 (Shahdara), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order’]. By the Impugned Order, an Application under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC filed by the Petitioner has been dismissed. 4. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent on advance Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:31.05.2025 C.R.P. 165/2025 Page 1 of 3 13:09:46 service draws attention of the Court to the order dated 19.05.2025 passed by this Court in C.R.P. 388/2024 captioned Sunnil Kohli vs. Madhu Aggarwal through her LR Barkha Bansal filed by the Respondent before the Court to submit that by the order dated 19.05.2025 passed by this Court, the order dated 07.08.2024 passed by the learned Trial Court dismissing an Application filed by the Respondent under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, was set aside by this Court with appropriate directions. 5. It is apposite to set out the relevant extract of the order dated 19.05.2025 passed by this Court below: “11. Since the plea of lack of pecuniary jurisdiction of a Court goes