BALWANT SINGH & ANR. vs ARUNA VIJAY SINGH & ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 07th May, 2025 + CM(M) 862/2025 & CM APPL. 27705-27706/2025 BALWANT SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate. versus ARUNA VIJAY SINGH & ANR .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Respondents herein had filed a consumer complaint which was registered as CC No.721/2020. There were two opposite parties in such complaint i.e. M/s Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Private Limited and M/s Bluebell Proptech Pvt. Ltd. 2. Such complaint was allowed by learned National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short ‘NCDRC’) and, accordingly, an Execution Petition was filed by the Decree Holders. The Execution Petition was, though, filed against the abovesaid two opposite parties but in para No.4 of the Execution Petition, the Managing Directors and the Directors were also arrayed as Judgment Debtors, while contending as under:- “4. That the Judgment Debtor No. 3 is the Managing Director of Judgment Debtor No.1 and Judgement No.4-6 are the Directors of the Judgment Debtor No. 1 and the Judgment Debtor No. 4 is also the Director of the Judgment Debtor No. 2. That the Judgment Debtor No. 4-6 are responsible to the Judgment Debtor No. 1 and the Judgment Debtor No. 4 is responsible to the Judgment Debtor No. 2 for conduct of their business as on the date the order dated 07.02.2024 was passed by this Hon’ble Commission.” Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 862/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:07.05.2025 19:06:51 3. The abovesaid Execution Petition was taken up by learned NCDRC from time to time and there were directions to the abovesaid individuals i.e. Managing Director and Directors of the opposite parties to appear b