ANOOP SHARMA vs BHUSHAN KUMAR NARULA & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on : 25 March2025 Judgment pronounced on: 06 May 2025 + RFA 486/2019 and CM appl. 23822/2019, CM APPL. 36866/2019, CM APPL. 53272/2019, CM APPL. 27751/2021 ANOOP SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Upamanyu Sharma, Adv. versus BHUSHAN KUMAR NARULA & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSPC with Mr. Gokul Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA JUDGEMENT 1. The present regular first appeal is being preferred by the appellant under Section 96 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“CPC”], thereby assailing the impugned judgment dated 23.03.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [“Trial Court”] in Suit Bearing No. 28/2018. BRIEF FACTS 2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the appellant/plaintiff filed a suit against the office bearers of respondent No. 8/CWGVAOA 1, as well as respondent No. 6/Delhi Development Authority 2 and respondent No. 7/Ministry of Urban Development 3, who are the main parties, who are representing the members/residents, who are serving in the said 1 Commonwealth Games Village Apartment Owners Association 2 DDA Signature Not Verified RFA 486/2019 Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD Page 1 of 19 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:07.05.2025 17:51:22 two respective departments. The appellant in the present appeal is a private individual who has purchased residential unit in Common Wealth Games Village4 [hereinafter referred to as “CWGV”] and is also the 3. The appellant/plaintiff contends that, owing to the alleged mismanagement of the affairs of the CWGVAOA by respondent No. 1, Bhushan Kumar Narula, in collusion with his associates, Civil Suit No. 28/2018 was instituted. It is further averred that respondents No. 1 an