ANJANA RANI vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 14.05.2025 W.P.(C) 3422/2024 & CM APPL. 13997/2024 ANJANA RANI .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Ranjeet Bharti, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Virender Pratap Singh Charak, Ms. Shubhra Parashar, Mr. Pushpender Pratap Singh, Advocates for UoI. Mr. Amartya Ashish Sharan, Advocate for NESTS. Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav, Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Advocates for R-4. Mr. Parmanand Gaur, SC with Mr. Vibhav Mishra, Advocates for R-5. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J (Oral) 1. By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks appointment to the post of Trained Graduate Teacher [“TGT”] (Hindi), pursuant to an advertisement issued by respondent No. 2 – National Education Society for Tribal Students, Delhi [“NESTS”] in the year 2023. 2. By way of the said advertisement, NESTS sought to recruit for several teaching and non-teaching posts. As far as TGT (Hindi) is 3. The petitioner’s application was on the basis that she has a “Bachelors Degree from a recognized University/institute in concerned subject and the requisite subjects are in all three y