ADNAN AZAM vs KISHAN SETHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~80 & 81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 26th May, 2025 + CM(M) 1002/2025 & CM APPL. 32857-32858/2025 ADNAN AZAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Zeeshan Ahmed, Advocate along with petitioner-in-person versus KISHAN SETHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: CM(M) 1003/2025 & CM APPL. 32859-32860/2025 ADNAN AZAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Zeeshan Ahmed, Advocate along with petitioner-in-person versus KISHAN SETHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Both the petitions raise identical issue and, therefore, these are being taken up together. 2. Petitioner, on the strength of Eviction Petitions being allowed in his favour, has moved two different Execution Petitions, which have been registered as Ex. No. 2954/2024 and Ex. No. 2955/2024. 3. During the pendency of the aforesaid Execution Petitions, objection petitions have been filed and the learned Executing Court has, merely, Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 1002/2025 & CM(M) 1003/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:27.05.2025 16:30:50 directed the decree holder to file reply, if any, to the aforesaid objection petitions. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is, merely, to the effect that objections were completely devoid of any merit and, therefore, learned Trial Court should not have even entertained the aforesaid objection petitions. 5. The next date before the learned Trial Court is stated to be 11.07.2025. 6. Merely because the present petitions, invoking supervisory jurisdiction, have been moved by the decree-holder, it would not mean that this Court should rather decide all such objection petitions, which are yet pending ajudication. 7. The petitions are accordingly disposed of with request to learned Trial Court to give