Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-23

ADITYA MADAAN vs COMMISSIONER CGST GST COMMISSIONERATE DELHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-5650/2024 2025:DHC:4427-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ADITYA MADAAN
Respondent
COMMISSIONER CGST GST COMMISSIONERATE DELHI & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~3 (SDB) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23rd May, 2025 W.P.(C) 5650/2024 & REVIEW PET. 166/2025 ADITYA MADAAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Babbar, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER CGST GST COMMISSIONERATE DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aakarsh Srivastava, SSC with Mr. Anand Pandey, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. REVIEW PET. 166/2025 in W.P.(C) 5650/2024 2. The present review petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner- Aditya Madaan seeking review of the judgment dated 7th February, 2025 (hereinafter, the ‘judgment’) passed in a batch of matters titled M/s Addichem Speciallity LLP v. Special Commissioner I, Department of Trade and Taxes Anr. (2025:DHC;737-DB). 3. Vide the said judgment, the Court inter alia decided the issue, whether delay can be condoned in an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. On this issue, it was held that the delay is not condonable. The relevant portion of the judgment is extracted hereunder: “69. In summary, the power to condone delay caused in 70. In view of the forgoing discussion, as it