Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-04

WRIT - C No. 6295 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 6295 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 6295 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30426-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6295 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mrs. Lal Vati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brajesh Chandra Awasthi,Jyotish Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Petitioner's claim for compensation in terms of the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatana Beema Yojana on account of death of petitioner's husband, has been denied consideration on the ground that the claim itself has been lodged after delay of 75 days of the accident, which is beyond the limitation. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on misconstruction of materials on record, claim of the petitioner has been rejected. Reliance has been placed upon the Government Order dated 14.03.2023 in which limitation of three months is made externable by a period of three months on sufficient explanation. Reliance has also been placed on the decision in the case of Gautam Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others reported in 2020 (11) ADJ, 321 to submi

WRIT - C No. 6295 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam