Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-12

WRIT - B No. 953 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 953 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 953 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36510 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 953 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gyanchandra And 8 Others Respondent :- Kedar Singh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamal Nayan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Azad Rai,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj as respondent no.5 in the array of the parties to the writ petition during course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Hari Mohan Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-resopndents and Mr. Azad Rai, learned counsel for respondent- Gaon sabha. 3. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.5/ Board of Revenue, U.P., Prayagraj to decide the Revision No.1271 of 2018 (Kedar Singh and others vs. Gyan Chandra and others), under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforementioned revision, under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no.5 since 21.8.2018. He further submitted that the copy of order s

WRIT - B No. 953 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam