Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-03

WRIT - B No. 950 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 950 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 950 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29787 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 950 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt Shakuntala Devi And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Adya Prasad Tewari,Devraj Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,H.K Asthana,Harish Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Sri Adya Prasad Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri H.K. Asthana and Sri Harish Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 & 7 and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Service of notice to respondent nos. 4 to 6 and 8 to 10 is sufficient as per office report dated 08.05.2024. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the mutation proceeding initiated under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 was decided by Tehsildar in favour of petitioners on the basis of succession and the claims set up by respondent no. 7 on the basis of unregistered will deed has been refused by Tehsildar vide order dated 04.01.2024. Against the order passed by Tehsildar Sadar, Gorakhpur dated 04.01.2024 a revision under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 was filed by the respondent Rameshwar Dubey and others was admitted by board

WRIT - B No. 950 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam