Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-10

WRIT - B No. 665 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 665 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 665 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:34583 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 665 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vikramaditya Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Lok Nath Shukla, Om Prakash Pandey,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Board of Revenue U.P. Prayagraj as respondent no. 5 in the writ petition during course of the day. 2. Heard Mr. Santosh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Om Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.4, Mr. Tarun Gaur, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Triapthi, learned counsel for respondent- Gaon Sabha. 3. With the consent of the parties, the petition is being heard finally without inviting any counter affidavit. 4. Notice is not issued to respondent no.2 by this Court as he is also lease holder and his interest is similar to the petitioner as well as other lease holder. 5. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner along with others were granted agriculture lease in the year 2010. Proceeding for cancellation of lease has been initiated at the instance of

WRIT - B No. 665 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam