Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-17

WRIT - B No. 11318 of 1996 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 11318 of 1996 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 11318 of 1996 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36872 Reserved on 19.02.2025 Delivered on 17.03.2025 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 11318 of 1996 Petitioner :- Ram Babu Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Srivastava,Deepak Kumar Kulshrestha,Rudra Pratap Singh,Satya Narayan Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- H.O.K. Srivastava,Rajeev Sharma,S.C.,S.N. Pandey Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Mr. Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Rajeev Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no. 2/ Gaon Sabha. 2. The Brief facts of the case are that a suit under Section 229-B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as "U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act") was filed by the petitioner and respondent no.4-Latoori Singh in respect to plot No.132, area 4.72 hectare (old Plot No.226/.87, 228/.97, 230/.28, 231/.23, 232/.33, 233/.78, 234/.60, 235/.30, 233, 234/1.10) stating that petitioner acquired the land in dispute by means of lease from the Zamindar on 15.02.1946 and the lease was duly mutated in the revenue records in 1354 Fasli. It has also been mentioned in

WRIT - B No. 11318 of 1996 at Allahabad · Niyam