Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-21

WRIT - B No. 1055 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 1055 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 1055 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41427 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1055 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Shanti Devi And Another Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation Varanasi, District Varanasi And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmala Yadav,Sukesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Sri Sukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Tarun Gaur, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Brief facts of the case are that an objection under Section 9A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (herein after referred to as U.P.C.H. Act) was decided vide order dated 13.09.1990 on the basis of Compromise entered into between Shukhdevi, Vidya Devi, Goverdhan, Sovardhan and Satya Narayan. Against the said order dated 13.09.1990 appeal under Section 11(1) of the U.P.C.H. Act was filed by petitioner no. 1-Smt. Shanti Devi wife of Satya Narayan along with the prayer for condonation of delay of about 24 years before Settlement Officer of Consolidation. In the aforementioned appeal objection was filed by private contesting respondents with the prayer that appeal should be dismissed on the ground of limitation as ther

WRIT - B No. 1055 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam