Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-21

WRIT - B No. 1045 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 1045 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 1045 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41573 Court No. - 49 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1045 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Ramshri Respondent :- State of U.P. and others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J. 1. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner in support of the motion to admit this petition to hearing at great length and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ray, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner's application for demarcation has been rejected by the sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sirsaganj, District Firozabad vide order dated 29.08.2023 on ground that his plot bearing no. 374/3 admeasuring 0.55900 hectare is included in eight khata, making its demarcation impossible. It is remarked that the petitioner ought to file a suit for division of holdings. Instead of challenging the said order or approaching the Revenue Court by instituting a suit for division of holdings under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 ('Code' for short), the petitioner has come up with a prayer that a mandamus be issued to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to proceed with the app

WRIT - B No. 1045 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam