Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-19

WRIT - A No. 3395 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3395 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3395 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39105 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3395 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners have questioned recovery of the commutation amount given to the petitioners, by means of installments from pension. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioners that since amount paid as commutation has already stood recovered, further recovery from the pension of petitioner is bad even though rules provide for deductions for a period of 15 years. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the controversy is no more res integra in the light of judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ashok Kumar Agarwal and others v. Union of India and another passed in Writ - A No.- 17819 of 2024 decided on 15th January, 2025 which has also been followed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Radheshyam Shukla

WRIT - A No. 3395 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam