Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-19

WRIT - A No. 3375 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3375 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3375 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39057 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3375 of 2025 Petitioner :- Saeed Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nisheeth Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of attachment. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner has not yet been confirmed and therefore, he could not have been attached to the Headquarter. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has been attached due to health reasons as he could not do field work for recovery. 4. In the given facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the report of the Chief Medical Officer, Gautam Buddh Nagar which has been brought on record, I decline to grant indulgence in the matter. 5. However, it is left open for the petitioner to make a representation against the order of attachment if he is still aggrieved and in a position to do the field work alongwith medical health papers including the fitness certificate to be issued by the competent authorised medical officer. In the event he files any such representation within a period of three weeks from the date of produc

WRIT - A No. 3375 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam