Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-18

WRIT - A No. 3310 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3310 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3310 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:38018 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3310 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arjun Singh, Constable Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atipriya Gautam,Sneh Madhur,Vinod Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard Sri Vijay Gautam, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Divya Jyoti, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. In this petition, petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 25.02.2025, whereby, he has been transferred from Kanpur Nagar to Shrawasti in administrative exigency. The contention advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was earlier transferred from Unnao to Kanpur Nagar on compassionate ground as his father was quite aged and ailing, suffering from Blood Presser and low vision and also his mother has sciatica problem. In such circumstances, it is claimed that petitioner has just spent 14 months' time that he has been transferred again. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed reliance upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Ram Bharat Verma v. State of U.P. and others, 2007 (69) ALR 5

WRIT - A No. 3310 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam