Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-11

WRIT - A No. 3094 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3094 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3094 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35867 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3094 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deepanshu Goyal And Another Respondent :- Rent Authority / Additional Collector (F/R) Muzaffarnagar And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Nipun Singh,Rishi Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard Sri Nipun Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel. Submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier landlord has instituted the suit before the Judge Small Causes under the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, 1887, however, later on he withdrew the suit by moving application and application came to be allowed without any further liberty on 13th August, 2014 and yet again he instituted a rent case for eviction before the rent authority under the Act no. 16 of 2021 on 26th July, 2024. It is further submitted that in view of the fact that there is no rent agreement between the parties and tenancy is covered under the new Act No. 16 of 2021, the proceeding of the rent case is governed under Provincial Cause Courts Act in the light of judgment of this Court in the case of Amit Gupta v. Gulab Chandra Kanodia,

WRIT - A No. 3094 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam