Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-19

WRIT - A No. 19291 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 19291 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 19291 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40352 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19291 of 2024 Petitioner :- Satish Chandra @ Satish Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Tiwari,Manoj Nigam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Instruction placed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has questioned the order dated 8th April, 2024, whereby his entire post retirement dues have come to be withheld only on the ground that Government has preferred a government appeal against the order of acquittal. Upon a pointed query being made as to what provisions of law are available with the respondent that permit him to hold post retirement dues even in case an employee has acquitted in the criminal case, learned Standing Counsel could not cite any such provisions of law. He only pleaded that since government appeal has been preferred petitioner has become punishable. In the considered view of the Court, unless and until there is a specific provision authorizing Government to wi

WRIT - A No. 19291 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam