Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-03-17

WRIT - A No. 122 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 122 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 122 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

A.F.R. Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37462 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 122 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Maimuna Begum Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kalendra Prasad,Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed for reconsideration of the reimbursement of medical bills that have been earlier forwarded to the Committee, but the same was returned only on the ground of delayed submission. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner being a widow, the authority ought to have taken a pragmatic view of the matter inasmuch as husband of the petitioner having died during treatment, the widow was badly shocked and could recover after sometime only. 4. From the perusal of the letter dated 17.12.2024, I find that the petitioner's claim for reimbursement has been returned only on the ground that it was not be submitted within 90 days period prescribed under the Rules. 5. In my considered view, if an employee has die

WRIT - A No. 122 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam