WP/9048/2019 of T.Hanumanth Rao Vs THE STATE OF AP

1 APHC010207262019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3396] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9048/2019 Between: T.hanumanth Rao and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in not Extending the Minimum time scale in the cadre of Conductors on par with other employees in the 3rd respondent temple as bad, illegal arbitrary, and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to extend the minimum time scale along with all consequential benefits and allowances in the cadre of conductors and pass such other order or orders……” 2 2. He