WP/8549/2008 of Y.B. HARANATH, VIS. Vs SRI SATYANARAYAN SWAMY TEMPLE, VIS. & 287OTHERS

(RNT,J & MRK,J W.P. NO.8549 OF 2008) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8549 OF 2008 ORDER :- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 28.08.2024, the following order was passed: “As it is represented that Mr.P.Sri Raghu Ram has given up his Vakalat and no longer represents that petitioner, list this case on 18.09.2024. 2. Registry is directed to issue notice to the petitioner to enable him to make alternative arrangements”. 2. As per the office report, the petitioner has been served on 14.10.2024. 3. Ms. Y.Bhanu Sri Akhila, learned counsel representing Sri P.Sri Raghu Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that no-objection vakalat was given and seeks adjournment. This fact was already recorded in the order dated 28.08.2024, directing the petitioner to make alternative arrangements. However, despite service of the notice, the petitioner has not made any alternative arrangements. Adjournment is declined. 4. Today, when the matter is taken up, there is no other representation for the petitioner. (RNT,J & MRK,J W.P. NO.8549 OF 2008) 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed “for want of prosecut