WP/6365/2013 of GUNTURU PADMA, VISAKHAPATNAM & ANR Vs GVMC, VISAKHAPATNAM & ANR

APHC010439422013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3460] (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 6365/2013 Between: Gunturu Padma, Visakhapatnam & Anr and ...PETITIONER(S) Others AND Gvmc Visakhapatnam Anr and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K MADHAVA REDDY 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.6365 of 2013 ORDER: As the Counsel for the Petitioners had expired, this Court on 19.06.2024 had directed the Registry to issue Notice to the Petitioners. 2. As per the endorsement of the Registry, the Notices sent were not returned and there is no appearance on behalf of the Petitioners. 3. Considering the passage of time and the issuance of notices to the last known address of the Petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that the present Writ Petition can be closed leaving it open to the Petitioners to re-agitate the case if so advised. 4. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is close