WP/25609/2024 of NAKKINA VENKATESWARA RAO Vs THE STATE OF AP

APHC010499362024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3525] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25609/2024 Between: Nakkina Venkateswara Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KATTA SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R Raghunandan Rao) The case of the petitioner is that the detenue had been detained by the Police on 05.11.2024, whereas, the detenue was arrested on 08.11.2024 and as such the production of the detenue before the Magistrate and the subsequent remand order requires to be set aside. 2 RRR, J & Dr. KMR, J W.P.No.25609 of 2024 2. The question of whether the detenue has been detained on 05.11.2024 or on 08.11.2024 is a matter of fact, which would be best, looked into by the Magistrate. 3. In any event, further proceedings in the Writ Petition would not be maintainable, in view of the fact that a remand order has been passed by a Magistrate of c