WP/19533/2019 of Mirram Chinnakka, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY. THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF o MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE honourable SRI JUSTICE ninala jayasury WRIT PETITION NQ: 1953.? of on>|Q Between: feiSS: « ...PETITIONER AND 2. The District Coliector, Y.S.R.Kadapa District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajampet, Y.S.R.Kadapa District. 4. The Tahasildar, Badvel Mandal Y.S.R.Kadapa District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ,h„ ■ Constitution of India praying that in the arcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein in attempting to dispossess the petitioner herein and attempted to take forcible possession of the extent of Ar n 7n . high handedly situated in an Badv , M ? ^-'hapali Village Mandal, Kadapa District, without issuing any notice and without conducting any enquir and without any authority as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, against to the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India particularly Art.3)0A, apart from violation of