Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · 2025-03-26

WP/18001/2017 of V V RAO AND 2 OTHERS Vs PRL.SECRETARY ( YOUTH TOURISM) AND 9 OTHERS

Citation / case number
APHC010719082017
Court
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Petitioner
WP/18001/2017 of V V RAO AND 2 OTHERS
Respondent
PRL.SECRETARY ( YOUTH TOURISM) AND 9 OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Nos.13704, 17223, 17275, 17325, 19605 OF 2018 AND 18001, 37606 OF 2017 COMMON ORDER: These Writ Petitions have been filed by the respective Petitioners to enhance the age of superannuation from 58 years to 60 years and also for grant of all consequential benefits. 2. Heard Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel for the Petitioners. 3. None represented for A.P.Society for Training and Employment. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Petitioners are the employees of A.P.Society for Training and Employment (APSTEP), which is a Society under Schedule-IX. Learned counsel would further submit that, when the Petitioners reached the age of 58 years, Government have taken step to enhance the age of superannuation from 58 years to 60 years w.e.f. 02.06.2014 and issued G.O.Ms.No.138, dated 08.08.2017 accordingly. Learned counsel would submit that, whereas, the Managing Committee of APSTEP in their meeting on 12.07.2017 decided not to enhance the age of superannuation of the employees of APSTEP on par with the Government employees. Learned counsel wo