WP/10096/2016 of Executive Director Vs Controlling Authority under the Payment Gratuity Act 1972

APHC010793502016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3504] (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10096/2016 Between: Executive Director ...PETITIONER AND Controlling Authority Under The Payment Gratuity Act ...RESPONDENT(S) 1972 and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S RAVINDRANATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) 2. The Court made the following: When the matter is called, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not available on the earlier occasions i.e., 07.01.2025, 28.01.2025, 21.03.2025 and even today also. 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 28.03.2025 LSP 3 199 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10096/2016 Date: 28.03.2025 LSP