Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-03-04

VINOD RAMBACHHAN PRAJAPATI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
BA/266/2025
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
VINOD RAMBACHHAN PRAJAPATI
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Judgment text excerpt

BA.2254.24 and group Amberkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2254 OF 2024 Chandrabhan Janardhan Yadav .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 262 OF 2025 Sandip Rambriksh Prajapati .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 266 OF 2025 Vinod Rambachhan Prajapati .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4709 OF 2024 Kunjal Bhagwan Vishwakarma .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................  Mr. Ayaz Khan a/w Mr. Dilip Mishra, Ms. Zehra Charania and Ms. Mallika Sharma, Advocates for Applicants in Criminal Bail Application Nos. 2254 of 2024, 262 of 2025 and 266 of 2025.  Dr. Samarth Shrikant Karmakar a/w Mr. Jayant M. Puranik & Ms. Arsuma Suhel for Applicant in Bail Application No. 4709 of 2024  Mr. Hitendra J. Dedhia, APP for Respondent No.1 – State in Criminal Bail Application Nos.2254 of 2024, 262 of 2025 and 266 of 2025.  Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, APP for Respondent No.1 – State in Criminal Bail Application Nos.4709 of 2024. ................... Corrected / Modified Judgment as per Speaking to the Minutes of order passed on 06.03.2025 1 of 36 BA.2254.24 and group CORAM :MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE :MARCH 04, 2025. JUDGEMENT: 1. Criminal Bail Application No.2254 of 2024 is filed by Accused No.6. Criminal Bail Application No.262 of 2025 is filed by Accused No.4. Criminal Bail Application No.266 of 2025 is filed by Accused No.5. Criminal Bail Application No.4709 of 2024 is filed by Accused No.2. 2. Mr. Khan, learned Advocate represent Accused Nos.4, 5 and 6. Mr. Karmarkar, learned Advocate represent Accused No.2. Since all above fou

VINOD RAMBACHHAN PRAJAPATI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam