Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-03-25

VIKRAM PRAVICHANDRA KAPADIA vs M/S. NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CO. AND ORS

Citation / case number
CRA/486/2017
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
VIKRAM PRAVICHANDRA KAPADIA
Respondent
M/S. NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CO. AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

04-CRA-487-2017.doc Arjun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.487 OF 2017 Vikram Pravinchandra Kapadia …Applicant ARJUN VITTHAL Versus KUDHEKAR M/s. National Construction Co. & Ors. …Respondents 1. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 25 MARCH 2025 JUDGMENT: 1. Heard Ms. Anita Castellino, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant/Petitioner and Ms. Ranjana Parikh, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1. 2. The Supreme Court in the decision of M. Nagabhushana v. State 1 04-CRA-487-2017.doc of Karnataka 1, has held that the principle of finality of litigation is based on high principle of public policy. In the absence of such a principle great oppression might result under the colour and pretence of law inasmuch as there will be no end of litigation and a rich and malicious litigant will succeed in infinitely vexing his opponent by repetitive suits and actions. The observations of the Supreme Court in M. Nagabhushana (supra) are squarely applicable to the present case. 3. The factual position in this case is as follows :- i. The Suit bearing RAE