VIJAY GUPTA vs AJAY PAL SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 03.03.2025 + RC.REV. 293/2024 & CM APPL. 12523/2025, CM APPL. 12765/2025 & REVIEW PET. 141/2025 VIJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, Ms. Shruti Priya Mishra, Ms. Mahima Bhardwaj Kalucha, Mr. Dinesh Sharma and Mr. Adhiraj Wadhera, Advs. versus AJAY PAL SINGH .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM Appl.12523/2025[Exemption from filing certified copies] 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. CM Appl.12765/2025[Seeking condonation of delay in re-filing] 3. This is an Application filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 5 days in filing the Review Petition. 4. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay is condoned. 5. The Application stands disposed of. REV. PET. 141/2025 6. The present Petition has been filed seeking a review of the order dated 23.01.2025 passed by this Court [hereinafter referred to as “Order in Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed RC.REV. 293/2024 Page 1 of 10 By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Date:11.03.2025 19:55:00 Review”]. A reading of the Review Petition sets out that what the Petitioner is attempting to do is to re-argue the matter before this Court. 7. Learned Counsel for the Review Petitioner has raised one challenge in this review. He contends that the finding on the availability of suitable alternate accommodation qua property no. 1640 Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Property No. 1640”] is not in accordance with law and that a triable issue was raised before the learned Trial Court which requires examination. 7.1 This Petition was heard by this Court on 21.10.2024 and thereafter, on 23.01.2025,