VED SAGAR GUPTA vs PRACHIN GAUR

Judgment text excerpt

$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 + RC.REV. 195/2024, CM APPL. 12106/2025 VED SAGAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Rana, Mr. Surender Gupta, Mr. Binod Kumar S., Mr. Gaurav Rana, Advs. with Mr. Sanja Gupta, Son of the Petitioner in-person versus PRACHIN GAUR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Adv. [appearance not given] with Respondent in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. Mr. Sanjay Gupta, son of the Petitioner and Respondent are physically present before the Court today. 2. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner needs additional time upto 31.12.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises. 3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that the Respondent is agreeable to allow time up to 31.12.2025, subject to the Petitioner paying user and occupation charges in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- per month, till the vacation of the subject premises to the Respondent. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:07.03.2025 RC.REV. 195/2024 Page 1 of 4 18:47:31 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this is acceptable to the Petitioner. 5. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the Petitioner, within a period of two weeks undertaking that: (i) The Petitioner shall hand over the vacant physical possession of the premises i.e., 612-A/E, Ground Floor, Tank Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the Eviction Petition [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]. (ii) The vacant, physical and peaceful possession of the subject premises will be handed over by the Petitioner t