UNION OF INDIA AND ORS vs NISHA

Judgment text excerpt

$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2802/2025, CM APPLs. 13328/2025, 13329/2025, 13330/2025 & 13331/2025 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish K. Dixit, CGSC with Mr. Shivam Tiwari, Ms. Urmila Sharma, Ms. Deepika Kalra and Ms. Venni Kakkar, Advocates versus NISHA .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 05.03.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The respondent had applied for recruitment to the Constable (Exe) Female in the Delhi Police. She qualified the selection whereafter she was subjected to a medical examination. As per procedure, the respondent was first subjected to a Detailed Medical Examination1 and thereafter to a Review Medical Examination2. 2. The DME took place on 19 January 2024. The report of the DME, apropos fitness, read thus: 1 “DME”, hereinafter 2 “RME”, hereinafter Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT W.P.(C) 2802/2025 Page 1 of 4 KUMAR Signing Date:12.03.2025 19:43:29 “19. i) Fit……….Medical certificate in duplicate enclosed…….. ii) Unfit on account of Urine RBCs 30-35/HPF iii) Temp. Unfit on account of Unfit + urine reactive - 35-35 / HPF (Medicine) ” 3. The respondent was thereafter referred to the Review Medical Board on 25 January 2024. The report of the Review Medical Board entered the following remarks: “Unfit in DME Due to Urine - RBC - 30-35 / HPF RPT Urine at 24/1 RBC 10-15 / HPF PTT - 15.9 sec USG - WNL Ref to LNH hospital for surgical and physician opinion All relevant details attach Urine -R/M KFT Coagulation USG abdomen Signature: (Doctor's signature) Dr. RINCHEN ANGMO DME Pol Board Mem BSF Hospital Police Rectt. Date: 28/1/24” 4. As recommended by the Review Medical Board, the respondent was examined by the LNJP Hosp