Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-03-27

TPL HGIEPL JOINT VENTURE vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
WP/2818/2025
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
TPL HGIEPL JOINT VENTURE
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA

Judgment text excerpt

Digitally signed WPL-15292-2024.DOCX by LAXMIKANT GOPAL LAXMIKANT CHANDAN GOPAL Date: CHANDAN 2025.03.27 15:15:33 +0530 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 15292 OF 2024 TPL – HGIEPL Joint Venture, ] Unincorporated joint venture between ] HG Infra Engineering Pvt Ltd. and Tata ] Projects Limited ] Having its address at: ] C/O Tata Projects Limited, One Boulevard, ] Lake Boulevard Road, Hiranandani Business, ] Park, Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400 076. ] …Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India ] (through the Secretary) ] Government of India, ] Ministry of Finance, ] Department of Revenue, North Block, ] New Delhi. ] 2. Deputy Director of Income Tax, ] CPC, Bengaluru ] Centralized Processing Centre, ] Prestige Alpha, Post Bag No. 3, ] Electronic City Post, Hosur Road, ] Bangalore – 560 100 ] 3. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax ] Circle 15(3)(1) Mumbai, Room No. 653, ] 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Maharishi ] Karve Road, Mumbai – 400 020 ]..Respondents ______________________________________________________ Mr Dhinal Shah (Through V.C.) with Mr Mihir Beradia, i/b, V. M. Legal, for Petitioner. Mr Akhileshwar Sharma, for Respondents. ______________________________________________________ Page 1 of 13 WPL-15292-2024.DOCX CORAM: M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. Revered on 25 MARCH 2025 Pronounced on 27 MARCH 2025 JUDGMENT:- (Per M. S. Sonak, J) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The rule is returnable immediately at the request and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner challenges the order dated 13 December 2023 (Exhibit-C) passed under Section 139(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”), declaring the Petitioner’s return as invalid. Though the impugned ord

TPL HGIEPL JOINT VENTURE vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam