Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-25

TILAK RAJ CHITKARA vs MANISHA JAIN

Citation / case number
CM(M)-950/2022 2025:DHC:2006
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
TILAK RAJ CHITKARA
Respondent
MANISHA JAIN
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25th March, 2025 CM(M) 950/2022 & CM APPL. 21207/2023 & CM APPL. 65276/2023 & CM APPL. 24369/2024 TILAK RAJ CHITKARA .....Petitioner Through: Present in person. versus MANISHA JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nipun Katyal with Mr. Nishchay Johri and Mr. Surya Pratap Singh Rana, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The challenge in the present petition is with respect to order dated 25.05.2022, whereby the learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal, while refusing to condone the delay. 2. Learned counsel for respondent submits that though the order in question does not call for any interference as the petitioner herein had miserably failed to show any sufficient cause, in order to put quietus to the matter, he would have no objection if, without prejudice to his rights and contentions and subject to imposition of heavy cost, the delay is condoned and a direction is also given to the learned Appellate Court to dispose of such appeal, as expeditiously as possible. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that he has already received the possession of the tenanted premises in