Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-27

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, CGST DELHI EAST vs M/S SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

Citation / case number
CEAC-3/2024 2025:DHC:2082-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, CGST DELHI EAST
Respondent
M/S SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27th March, 2025 CEAC 3/2024 THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, CGST DELHI EAST .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shubham Tyagi, Adv. versus M/S SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant- The Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Delhi East under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as made applicable under the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 174 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The said appeal inter alia challenges the impugned order bearing no.FO/ST/A/51474/2023- ST[DB] dated 26th October, 2023 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter, ‘CESTAT’). 3. The question that has been raised in the present appeal is whether under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994, the Department could have invoked the extended period of limitation of five years for raising a demand on the Respondent. The said provision reads as under: “SECTION 73. Recov