SURESH KUMAR vs SHEELA GOEL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 RC.REV. 561/2019 & CM APPL. 42666/2019 SURESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus SHEELA GOEL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Bambha, Mr. Rohit Bohra and Ms. Nandana Menon, Advocates with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The Petitioner is physically present in Court along with his son. The Respondent is also physically present in Court. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner needs additional time upto 31.12.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises. 3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that the Respondent is agreeable to allow time up to 31.12.2025, subject to the Petitioner continuing to pay user and occupation charges in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- per month, till the vacation of the subject premises to the Respondent. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this is acceptable to the Petitioner. 5. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the Petitioner, within a period of