SURESH KUMAR vs SHEELA GOEL

Judgment text excerpt

$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 + RC.REV. 561/2019 & CM APPL. 42666/2019 SURESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus SHEELA GOEL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Bambha, Mr. Rohit Bohra and Ms. Nandana Menon, Advocates with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The Petitioner is physically present in Court along with his son. The Respondent is also physically present in Court. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner needs additional time upto 31.12.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises. 3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that the Respondent is agreeable to allow time up to 31.12.2025, subject to the Petitioner continuing to pay user and occupation charges in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- per month, till the vacation of the subject premises to the Respondent. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this is acceptable to the Petitioner. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed RC.REV. 561/2019 Page 1 of 3 By:HONEY ARORA Signing Date:05.03.2025 21:06:21 5. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the Petitioner, within a period of two weeks undertaking that: (i) The Petitioner shall hand over the vacant physical possession of the premises i.e., one shop bearing No.2240, Gali Anar Wali, Dariba Kalan, Delhi-110006 as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the Eviction Petition [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]; (ii) The vacant, physical and peaceful possession of the subject premises will be handed over by the Petitioner to the Respondent on or before 31.12.2025; (iii) T