SUNIL TYAGI vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 11th March, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 521/2025 SUNIL TYAGI S/O LATE SHRI RAMESH CHAND R/O KHASRA NO.146, NEAR PATWAR GHAR BURARI, DELHI-110084. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhilash Pal Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohit Jolly, Mr. Pankaj Mendiratta, Mr. S. Kaushik and Mr. Rajan Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO P.S EOW .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Ld. APP for the State. Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate for the Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. A Bail Application under Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 („BNSS‟ hereinafter) has been on behalf of the Petitioner in case FIR No.05/22 under Section 420/406/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟ hereinafter) Police Station EOW. 2. It is submitted in the Application that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the Applicant nor anything has Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:12.03.2025 BAIL APPLN. 521/2025 Page 1 of 10 19:50:38 been recovered at his instance. The investigation is complete and Chargesheet has already been filed by the Investigating Agency. 3. His Bail Application on merits was dismissed by the learned Trial Court and also by learned Sessions Judge on 18.01.2025. 4. It is submitted that the prosecution story in nutshell, is that the Complainant-Om Prakash Arora had filed a written Complaint dated 23.08.2021 read with Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C‟ hereinafter) for registration of the FIR against the Applicant-Arun Tyagi and Dheeraj Tyagi on the averments that Dheeraj Tyagi had entered into an Agreement to Sell in respect of land measuring 2 Bighas and