SUNIL BAILWAL vs GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 14th January, 2025 Date of Decision: 04th March, 2025 + W.P.(CRL) 900/2024 SUNIL BAILWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rituparn Uniyal, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Mr. Alok Sharma and Ms. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates Mr. Amitesh Pandey, Advocate for R-2 + W.P.(CRL) 987/2024 KHUSI RAM BAILWAL AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rituparn Uniyal, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Mr. Alok Sharma and Ms. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates Mr. Amitesh Pandey, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA % JUDGMENT Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HEMANT PRATAP SINGH W.P.(CRL) 900/2024 and W.P.(CRL) 987/2024 Page 1 of 10 Signing Date:06.03.2025 15:39:28 MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J: 1. W.P. (Crl.) 900/2024 has been filed by the Petitioner/husband of Respondent No. 2/complainant seeking quashing of the FIR No. 514/2022 dated 06.08.2022, registered at Police Station (P.S) – Lajpat Nagar, South East, New Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and along with all other proceedings arising therefrom qua the Petitioner/husband. 2. W.P. (Crl.) 987/2024 has been filed by the father-in-law [Petitioner No. 1], mother-in-law [Petitioner No. 2] and sisters-in-law [Petitioner Nos. 3 and 4] of Respondent No. 2/complainant seeking quashing of the FIR No. 514/2022 dated 06.08.2022, registered at Police Station (P.S) – Lajpat Nagar, South East, New Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and along with all other proceedings arising therefrom