SUBHASH CHANDER KAUSHIK & ANR vs KISHNI DEVI @ KRISHNA DEVI

Judgment text excerpt

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 227/2019 & CM APPL. 49561/2019 SUBHASH CHANDER KAUSHIK & ANR .....Appellants Through: Ms. Somya Goel, Mr. Rohit Yadav, Advs. versus KISHNI DEVI @ KRISHNA DEVI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Kohli, Mr. Mohd. Shariq, Advs. % Date of Decision: 18.03.2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA JUDGMENT DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging the judgment dated 17.08.20219 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, South West, New Delhi in RCA No. 15/2019 (RCA Civil DJ ADJ/48/2019) titled Subhash Chander Kaushik & Ors. v. Kishni Devi @ Krishna Devi.Learned First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal challenging the judgment dated 13.03.2019 passed by learned ACJ-cum-CCJ-Cum- ARC(West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. 2. The present suit for permanent and mandatory injunction was filed by the respondent against late Sh. Suraj Bhan and the appellants, asserting RSA 227/2019 Page 1 of 10 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PALLAVI VERMA Signing Date:02.04.2025 15:03:52 that the plaintiff had purchased the suit property from her own income. The property comprises 100 sq. yds and 268 sq. yds, forming part of Khasara No. 61/17/1, situated in the abadi area of Village Palam, also known as Raj Nagar Part-II, Palam Colony, New Delhi-45. The plaintiff claimed to have acquired the property through two separate registered General Power of Attorney (GPA), Agreement to Sell, Will, and Receipts. The vendors were Smt. Gheghari Devi, wife of late Sh. Prabhu, and Sh. Sheri Kishan and Sh. Sukhvir Singh, both sons of Sh. Har Narain, residents of Village and P.O. Palam, New Delhi-45. The total sale consideration for the property was Rs. 82,800/-, and the plaintiff claimed to have t