Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-11

STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN & ORS. vs ANKESH KUMAR

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-3096/2025 2025:DHC:1626-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN & ORS.
Respondent
ANKESH KUMAR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3096/2025, CM APPL. 14660/2025, CM APPL. 14661/2025, CM APPL. 14662/2025 & CM APPL. 14663/2025 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak and Mr. Amit Singh, Advs. versus ANKESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL O R D E R (ORAL) % 11.03.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. CM APPL. 14661/2025 & CM APPL. 14663/2025 (Exemptions) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 3096/2025, CM APPLs. 14660/2025 & 14662/2025 3. This is one of several matters in which the Central Administrative Tribunal has directed the candidate, who aspired to be recruited as Constable in the Delhi Police, to be examined by a Dermatologist to ascertain whether he has a tattoo on his forearm. 4. Given the innocuous nature of the direction, we have, in several similar cases1, declined to interfere, noting that the Tribunal has merely directed the respondent to be examined by a dermatologist, who would assess the respondent’s functional fitness for appointment to the post of Constable in the Delh