Delhi High Court · 2025-03-25
SHRI LAXMAN DASS SACHDEVA MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY vs DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- W.P.(C)-11366/2023 2025:DHC:2074-DB
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SHRI LAXMAN DASS SACHDEVA MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY
- Respondent
- DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
$~43 to 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (43) + W.P.(C) 11366/2023 SHRI LAXMAN DASS SACHDEVA MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Namit Suri, Mr. Rameezuddin Raja and Ms. Tanya Sharma, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohtagi, Panel Counsel with Ms. Chandrika Sachdev and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. (44) + W.P.(C) 11374/2023 SOCIETY FOR EMPLOYMENT AND CAREER COUNSELING (REGD.). .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Namit Suri, Mr. Rameezuddin Raja and Ms. Tanya Sharma, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohtagi, Panel Counsel with Ms. Chandrika Sachdev and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. (45) + W.P.(C) 11382/2023 SHREE MAA LEELAWATI SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN .....Petitioner Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 11366/2023 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Date:28.03.2025 16:53:47 Through: Mr. Sameer Rohtagi, Mr. Namit Sri, Mr. Rameezuddin Raja, Ms. Tanya Sharma and Mr. Kartikey Singh, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohtagi, Panel Counsel with Ms. Chandrika Sachdev and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. % Date of Decision:25th March, 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA JUDGEMENT DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ: (ORAL) CM APPL. 64725/2023 in W.P.(C) 11382/2023 1. Having regard to the contents of the application and also considering the fact that learned counsel representing the respondents does not have any objections to the prayer made therein, the application is allowed. The amended memo of parties ha