SHRI CHAND vs PRITAM SINGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 03.03.2025 RC.REV. 50/2025, CM APPL. 8562/2025 SHRI CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ram Bhakt Agrawal, Adv. with Petitioner in person. versus PRITAM SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shamim Ahmad Khan, Mr. Kashif Ahmad Khan and Ms. Afreen, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.:(Oral) 1. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner needs additional time upto 31.10.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that the Respondent is agreeable to allow time up to 31.10.2025, subject to the Petitioner paying user and occupation charges in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- per month, till the vacation of the subject premises to the Respondent. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this is acceptable to the Petitioner. In view of the amicable resolution between the parties, learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions, submits that the Respondent agrees to forego any claim for user and occupation charges/damages. 4. In view there