Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-21

SHAKUNTALA & ORS. vs MURTI DEVI & ORS.

Citation / case number
FAO-213/2023 2025:DHC:1886
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SHAKUNTALA & ORS.
Respondent
MURTI DEVI & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 21st March, 2025 FAO 213/2023, CM APPL. 43603/2023 & CM APPL. 43604/2023 SHAKUNTALA & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Ms. Pinky Yadav and Ms. Shruti Geol, Advs. versus MURTI DEVI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kunal Kalra and Mr. Yaman Yadav, Advs. Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Standing Counsel for MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA DHARMESH SHARMA, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellants have preferred the present appeal under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rules 1&2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“CPC”] thereby assailing the interim order dated 28.06.2023 passed in CS DJ No. 687/2022, whereby the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-02, North West, Rohini Courts, Delhi [“trial Court”] has been pleased to restrain the appellants from raising any illegal or unauthorized construction in the suit property and also from creating any third party interest therein, till the disposal of the suit. 2. Briefly stated, the respondents/plaintiffs have filed a suit seeking possession of the suit property claiming that they are the 3. Suffice to state that the appellants have denied the a