SH. B.K. GUPTA vs SH. SATISH KUMAR GUPTA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 19th March, 2025 + W.P.(C) 3394/2025 & CM APPL. 16057/2025, 16058/2025 SH. B.K. GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhananjai Jain and Mr. Anurag Mishra, Advs. versus SH. SATISH KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. for R-1. (M: 7718992441) Mr. Hitesh Sachar, Ms. Anju Jain and Mr. Lakshay Nagpal, Advs. for R-2. (M: 9711428412) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL.16058/2025 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 3394/2025 & CM APPL.16057/2025 (for stay) 3. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner -Mr. B.K. Gupta under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking issuance of an appropriate writ seeking quashing of the recovery certificate bearing F. No. 107739630/RCS/S-4/2024/867 dated 18th October 2024 issued by Respondent No.1 Office of the Registrar Co-operative Societies . 4. The Petitioner has raised various grievances against the Respondent Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 3394/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:19.03.2025 23:29:25 No. 2- Kaymes Co-Operative Group Housing Society Ltd., which is managing Geeta Apartments, Block-17, Geeta Colony, Delhi-110031 (hereinafter ‘society’). 5. The present petition has not been properly drafted. At the outset, this has been pointed out to ld. Counsel for the Petitioner. Ld. Counsel apologizes for improper drafting in the petition and submits that he would file a proper affidavit. However, considering the nature of the matter, the Court has proceeded to consider the documents, which have been annexed with the petition. 6. The