SARVINDER KUMAR SAINI vs OM PRAKASH

Judgment text excerpt

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12.03.2025 + RC.REV. 383/2018 SARVINDER KUMAR SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus OM PRAKASH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hem C. Vashisht, Advocate with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM APPL. 14951/2025 [Exemption from filing certified copies] 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The Application is disposed of. RC.REV. 383/2018 & CM APPL. 14950/2025 [Additional time to vacate] 3. This is an Application seeking grant of one month’s time to vacate the subject premises. 4. The Petitioner and the Respondent are present in the Court today. 5. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, who appears on advance service submits that the Petitioner is not complying with the orders passed by this Court from time-to-time. He also submits that previously the Petitioner gave a statement before the Executing Court that he will hand over the vacant, peaceful possession of the subject premises on or before 05.11.2024. 6. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that he has no objection Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed RC.REV. 383/2018 Page 1 of 4 By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Date:17.03.2025 22:59:30 if the prayers in the present Petition are allowed. 7. The Application is accompanied by an Affidavit. 8. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that this Court by an order dated 22.01.2025 had affixed user charges in the matter and had passed the following directions: “17. The Petitioner/tenant shall pay to the Respondent/landlord use and occupation charges in the following manner during the pendency of the Revision Petition: (i) The user and occupation charges for the period commencing from 16.08.2018 to 31.03.2022 shall be pai