SARIKA BHAGAT vs STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Pronounced on: 20.03.2025 + CRL.M.C. 882/2017, CRL.M.A. 3717/2017 & CRL.M.A. 1708/2022 SARIKA BHAGAT ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Isha Kapoor and Mr. Jai Saini, Advs. along with petitioner (through VC) versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Nawal Kishore Jha, APP. Ms. Vandana Sharma, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 897/2017, CRL.M.A. 3770/2017 & CRL.M.A. 1640/2022 RAJAT BHAGAT ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Isha Kapoor and Mr. Jai Saini, Advs. along with petitioner (through VC) versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Nawal Kishore Jha, APP. Ms. Vandana Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J. 1. The present petitions have been filed under section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of order dated 21.02.2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-05 (West), Tis Hazari Court, New Delhi in Criminal Revision No. 56209/2016 whereby the criminal revision filed by the petitioners was dismissed and order dated 08.07.2016 passed by ACMM (West), Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi in Compliant Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 882/2017 & CRL.M.C. 897/2017 Page 1 of 11 Digitally Signed By:NARENDRA SINGH ASWAL Signing Date:21.03.2025 11:36:37 Case No. 15917/2016, directing registration of FIR in terms of Section 156(3) CrPC, was upheld. 2. The captioned petitions arise out of the same application/complaint case wherein the complainant is Chetna Kalra who has been arrayed as respondent no.2 in both the petitions. The petitioner in CRL.M.C. 897/2017 is the husband i.e. Rajat Bhagat while the petitioner in CRL.M.C. 882/2017 is the wife i.e. Sarika Bhagat. Since the petitions arise out of the same application/complaint and are challenging the same